Ingrande

Ingrande v. Kijakazi

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 11, 20253:22-cv-01574California1,243 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL I., Case No.: 22-cv-1574-DEB Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

v. COUNSEL’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO 42 FRANK BISIGNANO, Commissioner of U.S.C. § 406(b) Social Security,

Defendant. [DKT. NO. 16] 16 Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Counsel’s Motion for Attorney Fees Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). Dkt. No. 16. Neither Plaintiff nor the Commissioner oppose the Motion. Dkt. No. 19 (Commissioner’s Statement of Non-Opposition). For the reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS the Motion. I. BACKGROUND In October 2022, Plaintiff Michael I. filed a complaint seeking judicial review of the Commissioner of Social Security’s (“Commissioner”) denial of his application for disability benefits. Dkt. No. 1. The parties stipulated to a voluntary remand pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 402(g). Dkt. No. 10. The Court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.