Pfieffer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ADAM JAY STONE, No. 1:21-cv-01461-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER RE: BILL OF COSTS v. (ECF No. 312) ANDERSON, et al., Defendants. 16 On May 1, 2025, judgment was entered in favor of Defendants following a jury trial on Plaintiff’s excessive force claims. (ECF Nos. 310, 311.) On May 7, 2025, Defendants submitted a bill of costs. (ECF No. 312.) Plaintiff filed objections to the bill of costs on May 23, 2025. (ECF No. 315.) Pursuant to court order, Defendants filed a reply on June 3, 2025. (ECF No. 322.) I. LEGAL STANDARD Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d)(1) provides that “unless . . . a court order provides otherwise, costs -- other than attorney’s fees --should be allowed to the prevailing party.” The Local Rules of the Eastern District of California state that “[c]osts shall be taxed in conformity with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1920.”…