Dawson
Dawson v. Target Corporation
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 DYLAN DAWSON and JAMIE BROWN, on Case No. 3:24-cv-08167-AMO 11 behalf of themselves and all others similarly [Removed from Superior Court of California, situated, County of San Francisco, Case No.
CGC-24-618269]
Plaintiffs,
ORDER DENYING
v. DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO
COMPEL ARBITRATION
TARGET CORPORATION, SHIPT, INC.,
and DOES 1- 50, inclusive, Judge: Araceli Martínez-Olguín
Defendant. Filed: September 19, 2024 Removed: November 19, 2024 18 Trial: Not set
20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Before the Court are Defendant Target Corporation’s (“Target”) and Defendant Shipt, Inc.’s (“Shipt”) (collectively, “Defendants”) Motions to Compel Arbitration (Dkt. Nos. 23, 21), (the “Motions”). The Court, having considered the pleadings submitted by Plaintiff Dylan Dawson (“Plaintiff Dawson”), his Opposition to the Motions, (Dkt. No. 39), Defendants’ reply briefs, (Dkt. Nos. 41, 43), and Plaintiffs’ objection to Defendants’ new evidence submitted on reply (Dkt No. 6 …