Geoserve Energy Transport DMCC v. M/V 07 Vega S

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 11, 20253:24-cv-02148California3,309 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GEOSERVE ENERGY TRANSPORT Case No.: 24-cv-2148-RSH-SBC

DMCC,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART

Plaintiff, CLAIMANT OCEAN7’S MOTION v. FOR RECONSIDERATION

M/V 0 7 VEGA S, in rem, [ECF No. 51] Defendant.

17 18 Pending before the Court is a motion filed by claimant Ocean7 Projects ApS (“Ocean7”), seeking reconsideration of this Court’s order of April 2, 2024 striking Ocean7’s motion for damages. See ECF Nos. 50 (April 2, 2024 order), 51 (Ocean7’s motion for reconsideration). As set forth below, the Court grants reconsideration in part. I. BACKGROUND A. Proceedings up to Entry of Judgment On November 15, 2024, plaintiff Geoserve Energy Transport DMCC (“Plaintiff” or “Geoserve”) filed its verified complaint in rem against the M/V 0 7 Vega S (the “Vessel”). ECF No. 1. The complaint alleged that the Vessel owed Plaintiff approximately $188,000 for unpaid…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.