Dayal

Dayal v. County of Kern

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 11, 20251:24-cv-00039California3,461 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NISHI DAYAL, Case No. 1:24-cv-00039-JLT-CDB

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART v. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO COMPEL

COUNTY OF KERN, et al., (Docs. 64, 65)

Defendants. 14-Day Deadline

16 Pending before the Court is the motion brought pursuant to Rule 37 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by Defendant County of Kern to compel Plaintiff Nishi Dayal to provide “further responses” to three of Defendant Kern County District Attorney’s Office’s requests for production of documents. (Docs 64, 65). Plaintiff filed an opposition on June 6, 2025. (Doc. 66). Background Plaintiff, formerly employed as a Deputy District Attorney by Defendant Kern County District Attorney’s Office (“DA’s Office”) between January 6, 2020, and December 9, 2022,

1 Although counsel filing the motion presently represents only Defendant County of Kern, she asserts that the motion is brought also by, in one…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.