Doerer

(PC) Lanier v. Doerer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 11, 20251:24-cv-01178California1,289 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KAREEM LANIER, No. 1:24-cv-01178 GSA (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

v.

ORDER RECOMMENDING THAT THIS

J. DOERER, et al., MATTER BE SUMMARILY DISMISSED

FOR FAILURE TO EXHAUST

Defendants. ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES PRIOR TO

FILING COMPLAINT IN THIS COURT

16 See 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a)

PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTIONS TO FINDINGS

AND RECOMMENDATIONS DUE IN

FOURTEEN DAYS

20 Plaintiff, a federal inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil 21 rights action seeking relief under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of 22 Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971) (federal prisoner). The matter was referred to a United States 23 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 24 For the reasons stated below, the undersigned will recommend that this matter be 25 summarily dismissed for failure to exhaust administrative remedies prior to filing suit in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.