Deondre Raglin v. Restaurant Products, Inc

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 11, 20252:25-cv-01000California400 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. 2:25-cv-01000-MAR Date: June 11, 2025 Title: Present: The Honorable: MARGO A. ROCCONI, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

VALERIE VELASCO N/A

Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder

Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendants:

N/A N/A

Proceedings: (In Chambers) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION

SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO

PROSECUTE

On February 5, 2025, Plaintiff Deondre Raglin (“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint against Defendants Restaurant Products, Inc. d/b/a JAY BEE’S BAR-B-QUE and Beverly Neely-Williams (“Defendants”) and Defendants Does 1 through 10. ECF Docket No. 1 (“Complaint”). Plaintiff served Defendants with the summons and Complaint on February 27, 2025—accordingly, Defendants’ answer was due on March 19, 2025. Dkts. 7–8. The time for Defendants to answer the Complaint has now passed, and they have not challenged service in any way or otherwise responded to the Complaint. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(2), (b). Any such objection may therefore be waived. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h). However, Plaintiff has not moved…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.