Derek Hamilton v. County of Los Angeles

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 11, 20252:25-cv-02591California4,574 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8 DEREK HAMILTON, individual; Case No.: 2:25-cv-02591-MWC-MAR 9 Plaintiffs, [Hon. Michelle Williams Court, United 10 States District Judge; Hon. Margo A. vs. Rocconi, United States Magistrate Judge]

12 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, a STIPULATED PROTECTIVE California public entity; and DOES ORDER through 20, inclusive. 14 Complaint Filed: March 25, 2025 Defendant.

16

19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 1. INTRODUCTION 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.