Yates

(HC) Brown v. Yates

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 11, 20252:05-cv-01195California1,003 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EDWARD DON BROWN, No. 2:05-cv-1195 DAD CSK P Petitioner, v. ORDER B. CATES, Respondent. 16 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. This action seeking habeas relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 was closed on March 31, 2009, and judgment was entered. (ECF Nos. 22, 23.) Petitioner filed a motion for new state court trial, and on January 17, 2025, this Court recommended that the motion be denied. (ECF Nos. 42, 44.) On February 19, 2025, the district court adopted this Court’s findings and recommendations (ECF No. 44) in full, and denied petitioner’s motion for a new state court trial without prejudice to the filing of a second or successive federal habeas petition if authorized by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. (ECF No. 45.) On June 5, 2025,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.