Doe
Doe v. Bondi
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JANE DOE, Case No.: 25-cv-805-BJC-JLB Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING LIMITED
TEMPORARY RESTRAINING
v.
ORDER AND CONVERTING
PAMELA BONDI; et al., MOTION HEARING TO STATUS
CONFERENCE
Defendants.
[ECF No. 26] 17 On April 3, 2025, Plaintiff Jane Doe filed her “Petition for Mandamus and Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief” against Defendants Pamela Bondi, Sirce E. Owen, Garry D. Malphrus, and Kristi Noem (collectively “Defendants”) ECF No. 1. In her Petition, Plaintiff alleges that she “faces imminent deportation” prior to the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) ruling on her “motion to reopen removal proceedings.” ECF No. 1 ⁋⁋ 1–2. As such, Plaintiff’s Petition requests the Court order the BIA to “render a decision on Ms. Doe’s motion to reopen without further delay and prior to her removal from the United States.” ECF No. 1 ⁋ 95. On April 8, 2025,…