Marroquin
Marroquin v. Gordon
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FRANK ANTHONY MARROQUIN, Case No.: 25-cv-1075-RSH-DEB
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
v. PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
AND DISMISSING ACTION
MR. GORDON, Office of the Director, Department of Motor Vehicles, 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 On April 28, 2025, plaintiff Frank Anthony Marroquin, proceeding pro se, commenced this action. ECF No. 1. On April 30, 2025, the Court denied plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). ECF No. 6. On May 28, 2025, plaintiff filed an amended IFP motion. ECF No. 4. For the reasons below, the Court dismisses this action. All parties instituting a civil action, suit, or proceeding in a district court of the United States, other than a petition for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee. 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). An action may proceed despite a party’s failure to pay the filing fee only if the party is granted leave to proceed in IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1).…