Crandall

Crandall v. Teamsters Local No. 150

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 11, 20252:23-cv-03043California628 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARTY W. CRANDALL, Case No. 2:23-cv-03043-KJM-CSK Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION FOR A STAY OF DISCOVERY

TEAMSTERS LOCAL NO. 150, et al., (ECF Nos. 29, 30) Defendant. 16 Defendants Teamsters Local No. 150 and Dale Wentz filed a motion for a stay of discovery or protective order. (ECF Nos. 29, 30.) A hearing was held on June 10, 2025, at which counsel David Graulich appeared for Plaintiff Marty W. Crandall and counsel Costantinos Kerestenzis and Daniel Perle appeared for Defendants. The parties agree that there is only one claim remaining in this action: Claim One, the Labor Management Reporting and Disclosure Act of 1959 (LMRDA) claim against all Defendants. Defendants move to stay discovery pending the resolution of Defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings, which is scheduled for a June 26, 2026 hearing before the district judge. Alternatively, Defendants move for a protective order…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.