Ramirez

(HC) Foster v. Ramirez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 11, 20252:24-cv-02800California418 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DeEARL FOSTER, No. 2:24-cv-2800 WBS AC P Petitioner, v. ORDER RAMIREZ, et al., Respondents. 16 Petitioner seeks appointment of counsel because he does not understand what the court is asking from him and because he needs full discovery. ECF No. 12. In his request, petitioner notes that he completed and submitted his application to proceed in forma pauperis and gave it to an officer to sign and mail out. Id. Because petitioner appears to believe that he needs to provide the documents from the criminal case that he seeks to challenge, the court provides the following clarification. No state court documents are required at this time. If petitioner is able to state a claim against respondents, then the court will order respondents to lodge the state court record. What petitioner needs to do is file an amended habeas petition which identifies the judgment of conviction at issue, including the name and location…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.