Anzar
(PC) Medina v. Anzar
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAY MEDINA, No. 2:25-cv-0475 DC AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER ANZAR, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a request for leave to file a motion for a temporary restraining order (“TRO”). ECF No. 11. He wishes to file a TRO motion against “defendants ect [sic] al,” alleging that since the filing of the instant complaint, they have retaliated against him by (1) using psychotropic medication as a weapon/tool, (2) placing him in restricted housing unit based on false rules violation reports (“RVR”s), and (3) keeping him in “illegal max-custody since April 8th, 2025.” ECF No. 11 at 1- 2. Plaintiff is informed that he does not require leave of court in order to file a motion for a TRO. Accordingly, he may proceed to file such a motion. To the extent that plaintiff appears to seek leave to file an amended complaint, to align with his allegations in the forthcoming TRO…