Marriage of Riaz CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 12, 2025F087849California10,634 words

Opinion

Opinion

Franson, J.

FACTS

Background The parties married in 2005, separated in November 2019, and a judgment of dissolution was entered on July 20, 2022. The trial court listed the reserved issues related to the marital estate’s division as the “residential property, vehicles, loan from a third

2. party, household furnishings, loan to a third party [Zaid], watch business, alleged business with a third party, retirement, debts and taxes.” The court’s minute order from an October 20, 2022 hearing shows the parties stipulated that “the [third party] Zaid loan for $50,000.00 is community property.” The court instructed (1) the parties to provide “[a]ll documents related to ownership and payments related to the home” and “any credit card statements that are pre-separation,” (2) appellant to provide “documents regarding status of foreclosure on [the] home,” any information regarding various retirement accounts, and “documents regarding community tax debt paid by [appellant],” and (3) Husband to “provide documents showing ownership interest in Odessa,” “a list of watches … owned at the time of separation,” and his “2021 tax return.” Trial 1. May 4, 2023 Trial was held over seven days between May 4, 2023,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.