Bondi
Mateo Siche v. Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 12, 202524-2320California702 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 12 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ANDRES EZEQUIEL MATEO No. 24-2320 SICHE; MILAGRITOS STEFANY Agency Nos.
MARCOS TEJADA; GIANELLA AYMAR A246-016-117
GONZALES MARCOS; MELODY JESSY A246-016-118
MATEO MARCOS,
A246-016-119
A246-016-120
Petitioners,
v. MEMORANDUM*
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted June 10, 2025** Portland, Oregon
Before: TALLMAN, OWENS, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.
Andres Ezequiel Mateo Siche, his wife Milagritos Stefany Marcos Tejada,
and their two minor children (collectively, “Petitioners”), natives and citizens of
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Peru, petition for…