Bondi

Mateo Siche v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 12, 202524-2320California702 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 12 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANDRES EZEQUIEL MATEO No. 24-2320 SICHE; MILAGRITOS STEFANY Agency Nos.

MARCOS TEJADA; GIANELLA AYMAR A246-016-117

GONZALES MARCOS; MELODY JESSY A246-016-118

MATEO MARCOS,

A246-016-119

A246-016-120

Petitioners,

v. MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 10, 2025** Portland, Oregon

Before: TALLMAN, OWENS, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Andres Ezequiel Mateo Siche, his wife Milagritos Stefany Marcos Tejada,

and their two minor children (collectively, “Petitioners”), natives and citizens of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Peru, petition for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.