Martin

Martin v. USA

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 12, 202523-4037California866 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 12 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BOBBY MARTIN, No. 23-4037 D.C. No. 2:22-cv-09151-AB-SHK Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

MEMORANDUM*

UNITED STATES OF

AMERICA; BRYAN BIRKHOLZ, FCI

Warden,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California André Birotte Jr., District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 10, 2025**

Before: SILVERMAN, GRABER, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Bobby Martin appeals pro se from the denial of his 28 U.S.C.

§ 2241 habeas corpus petition. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Reviewing de novo, Lane v. Swain, 910 F.3d 1293, 1295 (9th Cir. 2018), we

affirm.

The Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”) found that Petitioner had committed the

prohibited act of possessing…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.