Tomas

Tomas v. Allstate Indemnity Company

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 12, 202524-2558California783 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 12 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LAURA TOMAS, No. 24-2558 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 3:23-cv-00830-JR v.

MEMORANDUM*

ALLSTATE INDEMNITY COMPANY, an Illinois Insurance company,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael H. Simon, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 10, 2025** Portland, Oregon

Before: TALLMAN, OWENS, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Laura Tomas (“Tomas”) appeals the district court’s grant of summary

judgment in favor of Allstate Indemnity Company (“Allstate”) on claims for

declaratory relief, breach of contract, and negligence per se arising from Allstate’s

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). denial of indemnity coverage under a renter’s insurance policy. We review a district

court’s grant of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.