Galvan

Galvan v. City of Tacoma

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 12, 202524-3325California536 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 12 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JERALD S. GALVAN, No. 24-3325 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 3:23-cv-05237-BJR v.

MEMORANDUM*

CITY OF TACOMA; TACOMA POLICE

DEPARTMENT; ANDERSON, Officer, Badge No. 260; KOMAROVSKY, Officer, Badge No. 241,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Barbara Jacobs Rothstein, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 6, 2025** Seattle, Washington

Before: HAWKINS, GOULD, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Jerald Galvan (“Appellant”) appeals the adverse grant of summary judgment

to the City of Tacoma, Officer David Anderson, and Officer Ron Komarovsky

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). (together “Appellees”), arguing these officers violated his Fourth, Fifth, and

Fourteenth Amendment…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.