Doe

Doe v. University of Southern Cal. CA2/8

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 12, 2025B333387California7,583 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 6/12/25 Doe v. University of Southern Cal. CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION EIGHT

JANE DOE, B333387

Plaintiff and Appellant, Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 22STCP03877 v.

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN

CALIFORNIA,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Mitchell L. Beckloff, Judge. Affirmed. Hathaway Parker, Mark M. Hathaway and Jenna E. Parker for Plaintiff and Appellant. Pazzani & Sandhu and Karen J. Pazzani for Defendant and Respondent.

_____________________________

SUMMARY

Plaintiff Jane Doe sought a writ of mandate directing the University of Southern California (USC or defendant) to set aside its administrative decision in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.