(SS) Madrigal Barraza v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 12, 20251:21-cv-00790California1,614 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALICIA MADRIGAL BARRAZA, Case No. 1:21-cv-0790 JLT BAM Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING THE FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS; DENYING

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY v. JUDGMENT; GRANTING DEFENDANT’S REQUEST TO AFFIRM; AND DIRECTING

FRANK BISIGNANO, ENTRY OF JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF

Commissioner of Social Security, DEFENDANT FRANK BIGSIGNANO,

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant. AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF ALICIA

MADRIGAL BARRAZA

(Docs. 20, 24, 26) Alicia Madrigal Barraza initiated this action seeking judicial review of a final decision denying her applications for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act. (See Docs. 1, 20.) Plaintiff contends that the ALJ erred by: (1) finding at step two that her hiatal hernia and bilateral foot pain were not severe 22 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.