Raskin
Raskin v. Bausch & Lomb Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 VALERIE RASKIN, Case No. 24-cv-06442-AMO
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING
v. MOTION TO DISMISS
BAUSCH & LOMB INC., Re: Dkt. No. 26 Defendant.
12 This is a putative consumer class action regarding the failure to warn of excessive zinc intake on the label of an eye health supplement. Defendant Bausch & Lomb, Inc.’s (“Bausch & Lomb”) motion to dismiss was heard before this Court on March 6, 2025. Having read the papers filed by the parties and carefully considered their arguments therein and those made at the hearing, as well as the relevant legal authority, the Court hereby GRANTS Bausch & Lomb’s motion for the following reasons. I. BACKGROUND Defendant Bausch + Lomb, Inc. (“Bausch & Lomb”) a New York corporation with its principal place of business in Rochester, New York. FAC ¶ 3. Bausch & Lomb “manufactured, distributed, and/or sold” PreserVision AREDS 2 (“PreserVision”), “a nutritional supplement [] …