Trate

(HC) Hill v. Trate

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 12, 20251:22-cv-01433California3,599 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 THOMAS AUSTIN HILL, Case No.: 1:22-cv-01433-KJM-CDB (HC) Petitioner, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

GRANT RESPONDENT’S MOTION TO

v. DISMISS

B. M. TRATE, (Doc. 22)

Respondent. 14-DAY DEADLINE

Petitioner Thomas Austin Hill is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action seeking habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Petitioner filed his petition for writ of habeas corpus on October 24, 2022. (Doc. 1). On May 7, 2024, the Court ordered Respondent to file a response to the petition. (Doc. 14). On September 12, 2024, after two extensions of time, Respondent filed a motion to dismiss the petition. (Doc. 22). On February 28, 2025, after three extensions of time, Petitioner filed his opposition to the motion. (Doc. 32).1 I. Background According to records from the Georgia Department of Corrections attached to Respondent’s motion (Doc. 22-1), following a …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.