Elliot

Elliot v. Spe Terra Nova Apartment Owners LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 11, 20253:24-cv-00447California1,089 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 RUSSELL ELLIOTT; NELLY Case No. 24-cv-0447-BAS-JLB ELLIOTT, et al.,

ORDER:

Plaintiffs, (1) DENYING MOTION FOR v. SUBSTITUTED SERVICE (ECF No. 33); SPE TERRA NOVA VILLAS AND APARTMENT OWNERS, LLC, et al., (2) RENEWING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE (ECF No. 12) Defendants. 17 18 19 Plaintiffs Russell Elliott and Nelly Elliott (“the Elliotts”) are self-represented. They filed this case seeking relief for alleged housing discrimination. (Complaint, ECF No. 1.) One of the Defendants is Victoria Orr. (Id.) Defendant Orr allegedly worked as the community manager for the apartment complex where Plaintiffs resided. (Id.) Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides that if the defendant is not served within ninety days after the complaint is filed, the court must dismiss the action against the defendant or order that service be made within a specific time. Although the 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.