Smith v. Adams County Combined Court

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 12, 20253:24-cv-01603California680 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MATTHEW A. SMITH, Case No.: 24cv1603-LL-SBC

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION TO SET ASIDE

JUDGMENT

ADAMS COUNTY COMBINED

COURT,

[ECF No. 7] Defendant.

17 Before the Court is Plaintiff Matthew A. Smith’s Motion to Set Aside Judgement.1 ECF No. 7. For the following reasons, Plaintiff’s Motion is DENIED. I. BACKGROUND On September 6, 2024, Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed a Complaint in this Court. ECF No. 1. Plaintiff also filed a Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. ECF No. 2. Plaintiff amended his Complaint twice. ECF Nos. 3 and 4. Plaintiff’s address is in Colorado. See Docket; see also ECF No. 7. Defendant Adams County Combined Court is also located in Colorado. See ECF No. 1 at 2. On October 7, 2024, this Court denied Plaintiff’s Motion to 26 27 28 Proceed in Forma Pauperis and dismissed Plaintiff’s Complaint, both without prejudice. ECF No. 5.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.