(PC)Hooker
(PC)Hooker v. Clendenin
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8 9 CAMERON HOOKER, No. 1:23-cv-00969-KES-EPG (PC) 10 Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING IN PART
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO
v. DISMISS THIS ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM
STEPHANIE CLENDENIN, et al., 13 Docs. 8, 10 Defendants.
15 Plaintiff Cameron Hooker appears to be a pre-adjudication civil detainee at Coalinga 16 State Hospital. Doc. 8. He proceeds pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed 17 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Id. Plaintiff challenges a California regulation that prohibits 18 internet usage for certain detained individuals on the ground that it violates the First Amendment. 19 Id. at 3, 7. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. The assigned magistrate judge screened plaintiff’s complaint and first amended complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 and issued findings and recommendations which concluded that 23 The complaint states that plaintiff is a “pretrial detainee…