Sharrod Moten v. L.A. Distrit Attorneys Office

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 10, 20252:24-cv-11252California814 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

JS-

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

#: CDC F-36382 CASE NUMBER Sharrod Moten 2:24-cv-11252-DOC-SP Vv. PLAINTIFF(S)

ORDER ON REQUEST TO PROCEED

District Attorneys Office et al WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FILING FEES (PRISONER NON-HABEAS CASE)

DEFENDANT(S)

The Court has reviewed the Request to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees (the "Request”) and the documents submitted with it. On the question of indigency, the Court finds that Plaintiff: [X] is not able to prepay the full filing fee. [_] is able to prepay the full filing fee. has not submitted enough information for the Court to tell if Plaintiff is able to prepay the full filing fee. This is what is missing: § prepay & □ acertified copy of a trust fund statement for the last six months. Pe IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: [_] The Request is GRANTED. Plaintiff now owes the Court the total filing fee of $350.00. An initial partial filing fee of $ is due immediately; this case may be dismissed if that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.