Cambron

Cambron v. Scale Social, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 11, 20253:24-cv-02498California1,110 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 AUTUMN CAMBRON, Case No.: 24-cv-2498-CAB-VET

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING GRAMAJO’S

v. MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK

OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION;

SCALE SOCIAL, INC. and RALPH D.

SCHEDULING ORDER

GRAMAJO,

17 Defendants. [Doc. No. 5] 19 Defendant Scale Social, Inc. (“Scale Social”) and Defendant Ralph D. Gramajo (“Gramajo”) filed a motion to stay this matter pending arbitration. [Doc. No. 5.] Gramajo also moved to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction over himself. [Id.] For the reasons outlined below, the Court DENIES Gramajo’s motion and ORDERS a telephonic status conference to discuss the posture of the parties’ arbitration. “When no federal statute governs personal jurisdiction, the district court applies the law of the forum state.” Panavision Int’l L.P. v. Toeppen, 141 F.3d 1316, 1320 (9th Cir. 1998). “California’s long-arm statute is co-extensive with federal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.