Holmes

(PC) Perkins v. Holmes

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 12, 20251:23-cv-01607California8,273 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 GARY RONNELL PERKINS, Case No. 1:23-cv-01607-JLT-EPG (PC) 10 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDING THAT MOVING v.

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO PARTIALLY

DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT BE JUDITH HOLMES, et al., DENIED. Defendants. (ECF No. 20)

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN THIRTY

DAYS

17 Gary Ronnell Perkins (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s complaint arises from his claim that Defendants acted with deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs by denying him orthotics and refusing to refer him to podiatry due to a change in the institution’s criteria for providing such care, despite knowing Plaintiff had been prescribed orthotics since 2006 and needed them as treatment for pain related to his bunions. (ECF No. 1). The Court previously screened Plaintiff’s complaint…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.