Holmes
(PC) Perkins v. Holmes
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 GARY RONNELL PERKINS, Case No. 1:23-cv-01607-JLT-EPG (PC) 10 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDING THAT MOVING v.
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO PARTIALLY
DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT BE JUDITH HOLMES, et al., DENIED. Defendants. (ECF No. 20)
OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN THIRTY
DAYS
17 Gary Ronnell Perkins (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s complaint arises from his claim that Defendants acted with deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs by denying him orthotics and refusing to refer him to podiatry due to a change in the institution’s criteria for providing such care, despite knowing Plaintiff had been prescribed orthotics since 2006 and needed them as treatment for pain related to his bunions. (ECF No. 1). The Court previously screened Plaintiff’s complaint…