Julia Kim v. Baxter Healthcare Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 11, 20252:25-cv-01985California672 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES — GENERAL

oes 2:25-Cv-O198S-MCS-MAR eg June 11,2025 Title Julia Kim yv. Baxter Healthcare Corporation et al.

Present: The Honorable Mark C. Scarsi, United States District Judge

Stephen Montes Kerr Not Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter

Attorney(s) Present for Plaintiff(s): Attorney(s) Present for Defendant(s): None Present None Present

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DENYING MOTION TO REMAND (ECF No. 25) AND ORDERING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE CASE

SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED

Plaintiff Julia Kim filed suit in the Los Angeles County Superior Court on December 8, 2023, asserting state law claims against unnamed “Doe” defendants. Plaintiff later amended her complaint, adding Defendants Baxter Healthcare Corporation, Cardinal Health, Inc., Fresenius Kabi USA, LLC, Hospira, Inc., Kenvue Brands LLC, and Quva Pharma, Inc. (See generally FAC, ECF No. 1-3.) Defendants Baxter Healthcare Corporation and Quva Pharma, Inc., were dismissed while the action was in state court. (See Not. Int. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.