Doerer

(PC) Benoite v. Doerer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 12, 20251:24-cv-01407California775 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHELTON BENOITE, Case No. 1:24-cv-01407-KES-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

TO SUPPLEMENT THE COMPLAINT

v. (Doc. No. 17) WARDEN J. DOERER, et al.,

ORDER SUA SPONTE GRANTING

Defendants. PLAINTIFF AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO

RESPOND TO SCREENING ORDER

JULY 14, 2025 DEADLINE

17 On November 18, 2024, Plaintiff, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics1 and the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”). (Doc. No. 1, “Complaint”). On April 1, 2025, the Court issued a Screening Order on Plaintiff’s original complaint and found it failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. (Doc. No. 14, “Screening Order”). The Court afforded Plaintiff an opportunity to elect one of three options no later than May 15, 2025: (1) file an Amended Complaint; (2); file a notice stating that he intends to stand on the Complaint as…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.