Crosby

Crosby v. Siordia

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 12, 20254:24-cv-07714California2,294 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ROBERT LEE CROSBY, Case No. 24-cv-07714-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING AMENDED

COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO

v. AMEND; REQUIRING RESPONSE

FROM PLAINTIFF

SALVADOR SIORDIA, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 16 Defendants.

12 Plaintiff, an inmate at California State Prison – Solano, has filed a pro se action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Correctional Training Facility (“CTF”) correctional officer Salvador Siordia. For the reasons set forth below, the Court DISMISSES the first amended complaint with leave to amend. DISCUSSION I. Procedural History On March 5, 2025, this case was reassigned to the undersigned. Dkt. No. 9. On March 14, 2025, the Court screened the complaint and found that the allegation that on November 24, 2022, defendant Siordia stole Plaintiff’s tennis shoes during a cell search in retaliation for Plaintiff threatening to file grievances regarding defendant Siordia,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.