Hernandez
Hernandez v. Richman Property Services, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 ROBERT HERNANDEZ, No. 1:25-cv-00010-KES-SKO
Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF
COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE
v. (Doc. 22) RICHMAN PROPERTY SERVICES,
INC.,
13 Defendant. 15 16 On June 12, 2025, the parties filed a joint stipulation dismissing the action with prejudice.1 (Doc. 22.) In light of the parties’ stipulation, this action has been terminated, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
22 Dated: June 12, 2025 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto .
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
1 The parties’ stipulation also provided that dismissal is “contingent on this Court retaining jurisdiction.” (See Doc. 22 at 2.) The Court in its discretion declines to adopt this portion of the stipulation. See Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America, 511…