Zarkowski

Zarkowski v. County of Kern

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 12, 20251:25-cv-00063California1,026 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARK ALAN ZARKOWSKI, Case No. 1:25-cv-00063-KES-CDB

Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING

v. CERTAIN CLAIMS

14 COUNTY OF KERN, et al., Doc. 6 15 Defendants.

17

19 Plaintiff Mark Alan Zarkowski is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. Plaintiff commenced this action on January 14, 2025. Doc. 1. Plaintiff did not pay a filing fee and instead filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”), which the assigned magistrate judge granted. Docs. 2, 3. On February 11, 2025, the magistrate judge screened the complaint and found that plaintiff sufficiently pleaded a Fourth Amendment claim against the two individual defendants but did not plead a cognizable municipal liability claim under section 1983. Doc. 4. Plaintiff was granted…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.