Walmart
Smith v. Walmart
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CANDACE SMITH, Case No. 1:25-cv-00419-EPG 12 Plaintiff, ORDER TO ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION BE WALMART, et al., DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, FOR
FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND FAILURE TO Defendants.
COMPLY WITH COURT ORDERS
OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN THIRTY
17 (30) DAYS
19 On April 10, 2025, Plaintiff Candace Smith, proceeding pro se, filed this civil action. (ECF No. 1). Plaintiff’s complaint is hard to follow, but generally, she appears to accuse 21 Defendant Walmart and other business entity Defendants of using security cameras to engage in 22 “gang stalking, attacking, robbing, and making false accusations and earnings from [Plaintiff’s] 23 legacy.” (Id. at 5) (minor alterations for readability). 24 Plaintiff filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) with her complaint. (ECF 25 No. 2). However, because she failed to answer some…