Dudash

Dudash v. Andelica

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 11, 20253:25-cv-01269California976 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT J. DUDASH, et al., Case No.: 3:25-cv-1269-CAB-BLM

Plaintiffs,

ORDER:

v. (1) DENYING IFP APPLICATION; ANDELICA ULLOA, et al.,

Defendants. (2) DISMISSING COMPLAINT;

16 (3) DENYING LEAVE TO ELECTRONICALLY FILE DOCUMENTS; and

(4) DENYING IMPROPER MOTION

20 [Doc. Nos. 1, 2, 3, 6] 21 On May 16, 2025, Plaintiff Robert Dudash, proceeding pro se, filed a complaint against nine different Defendants, including Child Protective Services, state judges, and the State of California, alleging that they kidnapped his children. [Compl. at 5.] Plaintiff also filed for leave to electronically file documents. [Doc. No. 3.] At the time of filing the complaint, Plaintiff did not prepay the civil filing fees 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) requires. Instead, he filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). [Doc. No. 2.] Then, on June 11, 2025,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.