Ramos

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DEMARION TRAMMEL, No. 2:23-cv-1111 KJM AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER A. RAMOS, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se. Findings and Recommendations regarding defendant’s motion for a stay have been submitted to the district judge (ECF No. 51), and defendants have filed objections (ECF No. 52). In light of those objections, for the reasons explained below, the Findings and Recommendations will be vacated and supplemental briefing ordered. The court also addresses plaintiff’s motion for appointment of counsel (ECF No. 53). I. Objections to Findings and Recommendations On May 13, 2025, the undersigned recommended the denial of defendants’ motion for a stay pursuant to Railroad Commission of Texas v. Pullman Co., 312 U.S. 496 (1941). ECF No. 51. In so recommending, the undersigned also sua sponte considered whether abstention was appropriate under Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37…