Fadika

(PC) James v. Fadika

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 12, 20252:24-cv-01773California682 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RONALD EUGENE JAMES, No. 2:24-CV-1773-DAD-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS NICOLOFAR FADIKA, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On July 8, 2024, the Court determined that Plaintiff’s complaint was appropriate for service of Defendant Fadika. See ECF No. 5. Plaintiff submitted the paperwork necessary for service by the Untied States Marshal and, on August 28, 2024, the Court directed service. See ECF No. 12. On January 15, 2025, summons was returned by the United States Marshal as unexecuted because Defendant Fadika could not be located or identified given the information provided by Plaintiff. See ECF No. 16. On January 23, 2025, the Court directed Plaintiff to provide additional information as to Defendant Fadika to enable the United States Marshal to effect service of process. See ECF No. 17. Plaintiff…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.