Villegas-Olea

Villegas-Olea v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 13, 202521-784California655 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 13 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ARTEMIO VILLEGAS-OLEA, No. 21-784 Agency No. Petitioner, A213-079-174 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 11, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: BYBEE, IKUTA, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Artemio Villegas-Olea is a Mexican citizen and national who first

entered the United States in 2005. Villegas-Olea seeks review of a Board of

Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal of an immigration judge’s

(“IJ”) order removing him from the United States. We deny his petition.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). “The BIA’s legal determinations are reviewed de novo and its factual findings

for substantial…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.