Bondi

Flores Gonzalez v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 13, 202523-2474California797 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 13 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSUE FLORES GONZALEZ, No. 23-2474 Agency No. Petitioner, A206-409-474 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 11, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: BYBEE, IKUTA, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Josue Flores Gonzalez, a Mexican national, petitions for review of

the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) decision dismissing his appeal of the

immigration judge’s (IJ) denial of cancellation of removal, withholding of removal,

and protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). “Where, as here, the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). BIA cites Burbano and also provides its own review of the evidence and law,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.