Brown
Brown v. Duringer Law Group, Plc
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 13 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JANEY BROWN; BING GUO; JUNXIAN No. 24-3964 ZHANG, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-10971-DOC-AGR Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v. MEMORANDUM*
DURINGER LAW GROUP, PLC;
STEPHEN C. DURINGER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California David O. Carter, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted June 11, 2025** Pasadena, California
Before: BYBEE, IKUTA, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.
Janey Brown, Bing Guo, and Junxian Zhang (collectively, Tenants) appeal the
district court’s denial of their renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). (JMOL) and motion for a new trial. We affirm.