People v. Osuna CA4/2
Opinion
Opinion
I.
INTRODUCTION
Defendant and appellant Roberto Tirado Osuna was charged with five felonies for
his involvement with a double-homicide robbery that he committed along with his
codefendants, Lee Johnson and Luis Ordonez Zepeda. In 2011, defendant entered into a
plea agreement, which required him to testify, as needed, in the prosecution of his
codefendants. In exchange for his guilty plea, defendant would receive a significantly
lighter sentence than the one he faced if convicted as charged (25 years instead of
years to life). His codefendants’ cases, however, did not resolve until Zepeda pled guilty
in 2020 and Johnson pled guilty in 2021. During that time, defendant initially
cooperated, but he eventually refused to testify in either codefendants’ trial.
In 2022, defendant moved to withdraw his plea agreement on the ground that the
prosecution had breached it. The court denied the motion, found that defendant had
breached his plea agreement, and sentenced him to an indeterminate term of 73 years,
months to life.
Defendant appeals, arguing that the prosecution violated the terms of the plea
agreement by taking 10 years to prosecute his codefendants and, in…