Abdul-Hafeez

Abdul-Hafeez v. City of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 13, 20253:24-cv-01184California8,927 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MUSLAH ABDUL-HAFEEZ, Case No.: 24-cv-1184-RSH-DDL

Plaintiff,

ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTION TO DISMISS

PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED

CITY OF SAN DIEGO, et al.,

COMPLAINT

Defendants. [ECF No. 25] 16 17 18 19 Before the Court is a motion to dismiss, filed by defendants City of San Diego (“City”) and San Diego Police Department (“SDPD”) officer Dominic Lazaga (collectively “Defendants”). ECF No. 25. Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 7.1(d)(1), the Court finds the motion presented appropriate for resolution without oral argument. For the reasons below, the Court grants in part and denies in part Defendants’ motion. I. BACKGROUND A. Plaintiff’s Allegations The instant civil rights action arises from Plaintiff’s arrest and detention. The Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) alleges as follows. Plaintiff Muslah Abdul-Hafeez is an African American male who routinely engages in “cop watch”…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.