County of Riverside v. Cigna Health and Life Insurance Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 13, 20252:24-cv-10793California2,804 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

JS-6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, on behalf of Case No. 2:24-CV-10793-SPG-MAR 12 Riverside University Health System, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 13 Plaintiff, REMAND [ECF NO. 19] 14 v.

CIGNA HEALTH AND LIFE

INSURANCE COMPANY; CIGNA

HEALTHCARE OF CALIFORNIA, INC.; and DOES 1-10, inclusive, Defendants. 19 20 Before the Court is the Motion to Remand Case Back to Los Angeles Superior Court (ECF No. 19 (“Motion”)) filed by Plaintiff County of Riverside (“Plaintiff”). Defendants Cigna Health and Life Insurance Company and Cigna Healthcare of California, Inc. (together, “Defendants”) oppose the Motion. (ECF No. 26 (“Opp.”)). Plaintiff filed their reply. (ECF No. 27 (“Reply”)). The Court has read and considered the matters raised with respect to the Motion and concluded that this matter is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); C.D. Cal. L.R. 7-15. Having considered the parties’ submissions, the relevant law, and the record…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.