Bollinger

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 MARIA BOLLINGER, et al., Case No. 1:24-cv-00303-JLT-SAB 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO ADJUST THE DOCKET TO REFLECT v. VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 41(a) OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF

STARBUCKS CORPORATION, CIVIL PROCEDURE

15 Defendant. (ECF No. 69) 16 On June 12, 2025, the parties filed a stipulation dismissing this action with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (ECF No. 69.) While Plaintiffs have brought this case as a putative class action, the Court agrees with the parties that Rule 41(a), not Rule 23(e), applies in the disposition of this matter because no class has been certified. Frias v. G4S Secure Sols. (USA) Inc., No. 1:20-cv-00403-AWI-SAB, 2021 WL 2894453, at *1 (E.D. Cal. July 9, 2021) (“On December 1, 2003, Rule 23(e) was amended to allow the ‘parties to a proposed class action to stipulate to dismissal of the action 24…