Singh
BMO Bank N.A. v. Singh
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BMO HARRIS BANK N.A., Case No. 1:24-cv-01517-JLT-HBK Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO
GRANT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
v. DEFAULT JUDGMENT1 HARJIT SINGH, (Doc. No. 12) Defendant. 14 DAY OBJECTION PERIOD 16 17 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment filed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(b)(2) on May 9, 2025. (Doc. No. 12, “Motion”). Plaintiff submits declarations with exhibits in support of its Motion. (Doc. Nos. 13, 14). Defendant has not answered or responded to the Complaint, nor has Defendant filed any opposition or taken any action in this case. Having considered the moving papers, declarations, attached exhibits, and applicable law, the undersigned recommends that the district court grant Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment. ////
1 This Motion was referred to the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and…