Kyle Jones v. City of Ontario

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 13, 20255:24-cv-01270California4,552 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

jJratm@ejso nRe sT-omuacyhesrt.ocnoem, SBN 184584 Melissa M. Ballard, SBN 185739 mmb@jones-mayer.com JONES MAYER 3777 North Harbor Boulevard Fullerton, CA 92835 Tel: (714) 446-1400; 5 Fax: (714) 446-1448 6 Attorneys for Defendants, CITY OF ONTARIO, OFFICER JONAH HELLMOLD, OFFICER

SERGIO GUERRERO, DETECTIVE GARY

NARANJO, and CORPORAL EMILY HALL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, EASTERN DIVISION 11 12 KYLE JONES and CRYSTAL JONES, Case No. 5:24-cv-01270-SSS-SPx 13 Plaintiffs,

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE

v.

ORDER

16 CITY OF ONTARIO, and Does 5 through 10 inclusive,

Defendants.

21 1. INTRODUCTION 22 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 23 Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, 24 proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public 25 disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be 26 warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to enter 27 the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.