Smith v. City of Fresno

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 13, 20251:25-cv-00420California558 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CANDACE SMITH, ) Case No.: 1:25-cv-0420 JLT BAM ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER ADOPTING IN FULL THE FINDINGS ) AND RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING THE v. ) ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE, AND ) DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE CITY OF FRESNO, et al., ) THE CASE ) Defendants. ) (Doc. 4) )

Candace Smith seeks to hold several the defendants—including the City of Fresno, Naomi Chavez, Hedi Briggs, and the FAX Bus System—liable for “refusal to pay doctor bills [and] injury compensation” following an “attempted bus crash” while Plaintiff was a passenger. (Doc. 1 at 4.) Because Plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis, the magistrate judge screened Plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). (Doc. 4.) The magistrate judge observed that Plaintiff indicated the basis of the Court’s jurisdiction was “federal question,” but found “Plaintiff does not allege any violation arising under the Constitution, laws, or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.