Fields
Fields v. Hill
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 CATHERYN D. FIELDS, Case No. 1:25-cv-00688-SKO
Plaintiff, FIRST SCREENING ORDER v. ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO: (1) FILE A FIRST AMENDED
COMPLAINT; OR
13 JEFF HILL, individually and in his official (2) NOTIFY THE COURT THAT capacity as Deputy District Attorney of Fresno SHE WISHES TO STAND ON County, et al.,
HER COMPLAINT
15 Defendants. (Doc. 1)
THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE
18 19 On June 6, 2025, Plaintiff Catheryn D. Fields (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, filed an action. (Doc. 1.) On that same date, Plaintiff also filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis, (Doc. 2), which was granted on June 10, 2025, (Doc. 4). Plaintiff’s complaint is now before the Court for screening. Upon review, the Court concludes that the complaint fails to state any cognizable claims. Plaintiff has the following options as to how to proceed. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint, which the Court will screen in due course. …