Duncan

Nelson v. Duncan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 13, 20251:25-cv-00700California2,720 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LOLITA NELSON, Case No. 1:25-cv-00700-CDB

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

v. (Doc. 2) RAYMOND DUNCAN, et al.,

FIRST SCREENING ORDER REQUIRING

Defendants. RESPONSE FROM PLAINTIFF

(Doc. 1)

21-DAY DEADLINE 18 Plaintiff Lolita Nelson (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, initiated this action with the filing of a complaint on June 9, 2025, against Defendants Raymond Duncan, Sanda Moody, D.A. Office/Prosecutor (“D.A. Office”), Janette Duncan, and Dajion Hill (collectively, “Defendants”). (Doc. 1). I. Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis Plaintiff has filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis without prepaying fees or costs pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (Doc. 2). The Court finds Plaintiff has made the showing required by § 1915, and the request to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) (authorizing the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.